Vibration, dynamics and noise
formerly BETA Machinery Analysis and SVT Engineering Consultants
Knowledge Center
- Downloads
- Technical Newsletter
- Recommended Guidelines and References
- Specifications
- Technical Papers
- Tools and Calculators
- Training
- Articles, Tips and Requirements
- An Integrated Approach to Manage Vibration Risks
- Design Requirements for Reciprocating Compressors
- Evaluating Compressor Operating Risks
- Five simple methods to check reciprocating compressor performance
- Important Differences in Pulsation Software
- Liquid Pumping Systems (Including Liquid Pipelines)
- Noise Regulations Around the World
- Noise Risks in the Gas Industry
- Performance Monitoring Examples
- Pipe Support Stiffness, GMRC Project
- Piping Vibration Design Considerations
- Piping Vibration Examples
- Structural Vibration and Ways to Avoid It
- Tips for a Successful Project (Vibration Control)
- Transient Conditions on Small-Bore Piping
- Vendor Requirements for Piping Vibration & Integrity Assessment
- Vibration-induced fatigue (whitepaper)
- Vibration Issues Affecting Gas Compressor Facilities
- Ask the expert
Five simple methods to check reciprocating compressor performance
How to spot-check the performance of a reciprocating compressor
By Dr. Bryan Long, principal consultant – vibration dynamics and noise
There are often occasions when it is desirable to spot-check the performance of a reciprocating compressor; just after a rebuild, as part of commissioning or when something seems different.
Here are a few things you can do:
| # |
Method, pros and cons |
Rating | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantification of difference in throughput | Diagnostic insight | Ease of use | ||
| 1 | Compare measured flow with that predicted by OEM sizing (or other) software. This is easy to do once a model has been created. Creating the model is not difficult but requires accurate load step numbers (clearances). Can identify if the throughput is below capacity Does not help identify the cause, requires a dedicated meter and loading curves or a software model |
 |
|
|
| 2 | Compare inter-stage pressures with software model predictions Points to which stage is at fault Only applies to multi stage, needs a software model |
|
|
|
| 3 |
For cylinders on the same stage, compare discharge temperatures. |
|
|
|
| 4 |
Check for hot valves by comparing equivalent valve cap temperatures |
|
|
|
| 5 |
Calculate the capacity of each stage separately based on observed pressures and suction temperatures and look for significant discrepancy. A model is not required but best to set up an Excel calculation (which requires gas properties). If there is a significant difference, the lower value is the more accurate result, and the other stage has a problem. |
|
|
|
| 6 |
Detailed analysis of pressure-volume curves along with ultrasonic patterns. Well, this is not so simple; included here for comparison.
|
|
|
|
Examples
|
|
The discharge temperature of a cylinder with a valve leak (black curve) increased, compared to another cylinder on the same stage (red), until a repair was made. |
 |
|
Suction valve cap temperatures show one significantly higher reading, indicating a leak. |
|
|
Calculated capacity of stage 1 increases relative to stage 2 as a leak develops. The leak is verified by the rising discharge temperature deviation (black curve). |
Related Pages
Performance Assessment (Thermodynamic) • Machinery Condition and Performance Monitoring • Condition Monitoring and Remote Vibration Analysis •
Free webinar
Learn how how to specify a a remote monitoring system for reliability, integrity or noise troubleshooting. Register now
